A Third Red Scare: Should America Fear the Rise of China?

A Third Red Scare: Should America Fear the Rise of China?
May 16, 2013 By Trey Archer , eChinacities.com

The term “Red Scare” describes the propagation of fear towards communism or socialism in America during the 20th century. The first Red Scare (1919-1921) was an anti-leftist response to the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 and the rise of socialist and pacifist groups who opposed US involvement in the First World War. The Second Red Scare, or McCarthyism (1947-1957), flared up from the communist revolutions in China and Korea, the Soviet takeover of Eastern Europe and the witch-hunts lead by Senator Joseph McCarthy of perceived socialist conspirators, spies and sympathizers within the United States. Though the Cold War melted into the pages of history several decades ago, some still associate the rise of China with a third Red Scare. But is there really any reason to be frightened, especially since former president Hu Jintao has announced a “peaceful rise to power” policy? Or is China truly an upcoming threat to Western values and democracy?

The new competitor on the block

The “Sleeping Dragon” of China has awakened and is on the rise to superpower status, challenging the power of the West and the US. In three decades, the impoverished nation on the brink of collapse has grown to become the second largest economy with a GDP of more than $7 trillion and still continues to experience robust growth even during the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. China is spreading her global influence and reaching out to places in Southeast Asia and Africa, as well as making ties in the United States’ own “backyard” of Latin America and the Caribbean. Beijing has also undergone a military buildup and invested $166 billion into the armed forces last year, making it the second largest military spender in the world. China is now considered a major military power with its first aircraft carrier, nuclear arsenal, large standing army as well as being one of the top players in the field of cyber warfare.

As one can see, China is contending with the US economically, politically and militarily—something that deeply frightens the US. Yet, this situation is not actually that unique. For some reason—realpolitik or otherwise—it seems that the US fears any power, communist or not, that rivals her might. Japan’s economic rise in the 1970s and 1980s lead to a not entirely dissimilar wave of “Yellow Peril”, where many Americans believed Japan would take over the world. According to a 1991 ABC News/NHK poll, 60% of Americans viewed Japan’s economic power as a “threat” while auto workers in Detroit thought Japanese companies were stealing their jobs, ultimately leading to a wave of violent anti-Japanese demonstrations. While some denounce the possibility of another Red Scare, it could happen since the US—from the communist spies of the USSR to the capitalist businessmen of Japan—is inherently weary of any rival nations.

Nouveau McCarthyism- an exaggerated threat

The Second Red Scare in the 1950s—the McCarthy era—is now perceived as grossly exaggerated, with hundreds of so-called communists (or “pinkos”) named on the Hollywood Blacklist and other alleged socialists in the government accused of being involved in “anti-American activity.” Likewise, the Third Red Scare could be exaggerated as well, since China is still decades behind the US. Based off data from the IMF, China’s 2012 GDP in terms of purchasing power parity per capita weighed in at 9,162 USD and was internationally ranked at 93 out of 187 listed countries—below the Dominican Republic and slightly above Jamaica. The US on the other hand ranked 6th with nearly 50,000 USD, while the majority of nations in the top 20 are Western countries. Though some scholars have forewarned that China’s GDP will overtake the US by 2020, the above GDP PPP per capita data (which is a better measurement for comparing standards of living between countries) not only shows that the average Chinese citizen’s purchasing power is still light years behind the US; it clearly illustrates that China still has a lot of catching up to do if it simply wants to be considered a proper “developed county”.

Even though China’s military is modernizing quickly, it’s far behind the US, which invested $711 billion into the military in 2012—more than all the other countries in the top ten combined, and about 6-7 times greater than China’s annual military spending! And while China is reaching out to others around the world, it’s mostly for business purposes. It’s essential for China to gain raw materials to continue growing, making the resource rich nations of Latin America, Africa and SE Asia prime candidates for business deals. But just because China is doing more business around the world doesn’t necessarily mean these countries are dropping the US in favor of China. In fact, the US is doing the same in China’s “backyard” by improving ties with Myanmar, India, the Philippines and Vietnam to check China’s regional influence, while South Korea, Taiwan and Japan are all long-time American allies. For now China vs. the US in the arena of soft and hard power is synonymous with David vs. Goliath.

The “secret weapons”

New York Times journalist Thomas Friedman argues that though "one-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks… when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages." China’s Leninist system just needs a few people at the top of the pyramid to make a decision and that decision can go into effect immediately. Contrarily, laws in the US have to pass through the Congress, the Senate and the Oval Office, in a process that can take months or even years. Also in America, Republicans and Democrats constantly sabotage one another just so their party can pull ahead rather than work together for the good of the state. Although China’s monopoly on power is certainly allowing them to move forward at lightning speed, a major drawback is the graft often found within its nontransparent, Leninist institutions. In fact rampant corruption is believed to be so bad that it’s actually even threatening the very legitimacy of the Chinese Communist Party.

Fareed Zakaria in “The Post American World” argues that the US also possesses a “secret weapon”, stating that education and immigration are where America sets itself apart. In his words, “higher education is America’s best industry” and the “United States absolutely dominates higher education, having either 42 or 68 percent of the world’s top 50 universities [depending on which study you follow]” to attract some of the best minds from abroad to work in the United States. Furthermore, China is aging quickly due to its demographic burden, while the US will continue to stay young from immigration.

But the US—similar to corruption in the CCP—is abusing its secret weapon. Amy Chua argues in her book Day of Empire that one of the many convoluted reasons empires (even perhaps the US) collapse is from the government cracking down on minority civil liberties. With the US currently taking the toughest stance on immigration ever, America’s advantage through immigration could come to an abrupt end and, following Chua’s theory, become one of the many factor’s that leads to the country’s downfall.

No need for witch-hunts

Though still the most powerful country in the world by many measures, the US is in a state of decline, having put itself in a bind with two costly wars and a mammoth amount of national debt. Meanwhile much of the developing world, most notably China, is playing catch-up, making the US fearful of losing its crown and leading to murmurings of a third Red Scare.

If the US wants to maintain its position in the world, it’d be beneficial for Washington to quit worrying about the rise of China and other potential competitors (as it has with the Red Scare and Yellow Peril) and focus instead on improving domestic issues concerning education, the ailing economy, unemployment and immigration. Failing to do so will only lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy wherein the US continues rolling downhill, which creates new opportunities for the ambitious countries of the developing world. If this is the case and the US gets stuck in its usual state of paranoia, history may repeat itself and the Third Red Scare could become a reality with fear, propaganda and yes, even witch-hunts targeting “socialist Sinophiles”. Let’s hope that it doesn’t come to that.
 

Related links
Is China Still Following Deng Xiaoping's Axiom, "Hide Your Strength, Bide Your time?
Light Years Behind: Can China’s Space Programme Catch Up to US’s?
Decisions, Decisions: How Will China Position Itself in Asia

Warning:The use of any news and articles published on eChinacities.com without written permission from eChinacities.com constitutes copyright infringement, and legal action can be taken.

Keywords: rise of China second red scare third red scare first red scare red scare

14 Comments

All comments are subject to moderation by eChinacities.com staff. Because we wish to encourage healthy and productive dialogue we ask that all comments remain polite, free of profanity or name calling, and relevant to the original post and subsequent discussion. Comments will not be deleted because of the viewpoints they express, only if the mode of expression itself is inappropriate.

Mateusz

"Amy Chua argues in her book Day of Empire that one of the many convoluted reasons empires (even perhaps the US) collapse is from the government cracking down on minority civil liberties" In China, minorities don't have civil liberties. Plenty of average Han Chinese are at their core decent, non-racist and tolerant people (not all, but many, if not most), but there is a strong undercurrent of xenophobia (all non-yellow people are eternally "foreigners", and treated as such), and most of us learn soon enough that the police aren't our friends.

Aug 07, 2013 20:48 Report Abuse

jknox00

Joe McCarthy is, tragically, perceived as having created a grossly exaggerated 'scare' in the 50s'. Ironically, he is perceived this way because there were indeed many communists in the media and to this day have taken revenge by destroying the man's reputation. The facts are different. McCarthy absolutely and correctly identified hundreds of full-fledged communists and plenty who were, undoubtedly, compromising the safety of the USA. This is well recorded and documented. Yes, there was a 'Red Scare' and it was no 'phobia' as very real communists like the Rosenbergs really did commit horrific problems through spying and selling secrets that compromised the safety of US citizens. Unfortunately, the Hollywood Blacklist wasn't successful enough as the power of movies, pundits and celebrity succeeded in convincing everyone McCarthy was not only wrong but a despicable human being. In fact, I would bet the author of this article has so often heard McCarthy was failure that he never even thought to question it. Is just 'assumed' from everything he's heard on TV, movies or his liberal Uni professor's use of the word 'McCartheyism' in a derogatory tone of voice?

Jun 09, 2013 05:37 Report Abuse

Guest2046970

americans seem to be obsessed.

May 22, 2013 10:53 Report Abuse

Guest2272720

The US population is enjoying life - they aren't comparing or contrasting China and the US - they're having fun in life with people they love. In regards to this: "The Sleeping Dragon of China has awakened and is on the rise to superpower status" China was only "awakened" and able to modernize through direct Western investment (US in particular) in the manufacturing sector. It's incredibly arrogant not mention this or breeze past it - it's a fact.

May 19, 2013 23:41 Report Abuse

13david

Try again. As I was saying . China is a capitalist nation with a totalitarian government who aren't scared of the US or anyone else. Their history shows that they are ruthless and they like the look of world domination as the US has over such a very short period, historically speaking. Be afraid, be very afraid.

May 19, 2013 15:22 Report Abuse

13david

Why the hell do so many of my posts not appear?

May 19, 2013 15:16 Report Abuse

rasklnik

-Oddly there is evidence that suggests a more democratic China would be an even more aggressive, natlionalist China. Although the Party likes to play up foreign threats, they don't want to lose the money by firing shots.

May 18, 2013 09:07 Report Abuse

mattsm84

I think that that's true in the short term. Remember that the reason that the public is so aggressive is because they are educated to be that way by the CCP to keep them in line. The subtext of any history lesson from the Century of Humiliations is that China needs a strong, authoritarian government to keep foreign aggressors at bay. Theoretically, a more democratic government wouldn't really need demonize the outside world to maintain stability.

May 19, 2013 02:10 Report Abuse

Guest688330

The article compared China vs. USA to David and Goliath. Indicating that the USA was superior to China in projecting both hard and soft power. But to best of my recollection David ends up slaying Goliath and even decapitates his lifeless body. I think you should have chosen a more suitable analogy.

May 16, 2013 10:12 Report Abuse

carlstar

Do yourself a favour and unlearn "soft and hard power". Yes i know it was in an article once but not coined.

May 16, 2013 19:51 Report Abuse

Guest2272720

Are you implying that China, a nation of 1.35 billion people, is David? I'm confused.

May 19, 2013 23:43 Report Abuse

mattsm84

Yea, China is a commercial partner with whom commerce has been mutually beneficial and not much else. Despite three decades of Chinese economic growth at near 10%, the United States economy still possesses the same share of the world economy as measured by GDP as it did in 1969.

May 16, 2013 01:05 Report Abuse

beijinger333

I mean, I'm not even sure how to respond to this article. Is this a joke? Talk to someone who has spent a good amount of time in both America and China and it's not even close. The vast majority of people in America don't care about what's going on in China. Only in China is there article after article depicting a comparative narrative between the US and China. The headline of this article, and most of the stuff in it, is just to get a reaction out of people, not too much substance.

May 16, 2013 00:23 Report Abuse

mattsm84

A lot of articles forward an outrageous premise in the title then spend the rest of the piece refuting or adding some amount of nuance that seemingly undermine it. It's a way of attracting readership.

May 16, 2013 00:50 Report Abuse