Topic: news 6 Lucrative Job Alternatives to Teaching in China

I don't think you should be so hard on native speakers when you obviously need us so desperately.

"All unemployable whites back home go to China and other Asian countries to offer expertise in various filed." This should instead read something like 'The whites who come to China and other Asian countries to offer expertise in various fields are in fact unemployable in their own countries.' When writing in your second language its best to keep your sentence structure simple, rather than muddle the whole thing by piling clauses on top of one another. It just makes your writing appear confused. Also, mind your nouns for singulars and plurals. Various fields.

"Of course, China gets the louziest ones, mostly without any academic credentials from a proper university-often with fake degrees."

Adding a qualifier--in this instance 'proper'--should be done to clarify, not obfuscate. What exactly do you mean by a proper university? Within the top 50 or 100 or some other number on a particular list? And if so, which list? Or do you mean proper as in holding accreditation? You should try to be specific as possible when writing to make an argument.

"You can find Whites from the USA, Canada, England and Australia everywhere in China who are hire d to teach English and other subjects (math, physics and chemistry etc) -However. most whites they hire in China do not have any clues as to what they are teaching ---They are hired by Chinese schools for show up--because it seems that Chinese seem to regard Whites as their gods and Lords."

This sentence is a total re-write based on the punctuation alone. A good rule of thumb for the fancier punctuation marks--such as colons, semi-colons, nut and mutton dashes-- is to avoid using them unless you know how and when to us them. I'm not saying you need to memorize the Chicago manual of style, but it doesn't hurt to give a quick glance if you find yourself lost. From the looks of it looks like you were.

Don't over use the phrase 'in China.' We know where it is that these things supposedly occur, using it over and over again is just redundant.

Avoid using 'seems.' And never twice in the same sentence. It makes your points less assertive. If you're going to make a point, then stop hiding behind equivocations and make it.

On the nit-picky side of things, its 'have a clue' not 'have any clues,' 'to show up' not 'for show up,' and there is no need to capitalize 'Lords.'

"For you do not want to admit the fact that you are not employable in your own country because either you are useless as a person or you do not have a proper university education or you have bad record back home, including criminal------For it is a well known fact that most Whites go to China or any other Asian countries for two major measons : 1. because they are unemployable in their own countries; and 2. exploit sex and corrupt Asian Women."

Consider breaking this up into several smaller sentences.

Avoid beginning a sentence with 'For..." because you'll find yourself either using cliches as transitions or, at the very least, getting laughed at by your audience for adopting such a bombastic tone.

Say 'or you have a criminal record' instead of 'you have bad record back home, including criminal.'

Say 'exploit Asian women' instead of 'exploit sex and corrupt Asian Women.'

Again, avoid using punctuation you don't understand.

"I have seen those cheap White monstors everywhere in Asia."

Put a comma after cheap.

Anyway, good luck with your studies! :D